Which of the following results in the revocation of registration?

The choice indicating that a third offense for a grave offense results in the revocation of registration is accurate because it reflects the policy framework governing the actions and decisions related to customs compliance and registration status. In many regulatory environments, repeated violations can lead to stricter consequences.

A grave offense typically implies a serious breach of regulations, and a third occurrence indicates a pattern of non-compliance that suggests the individual may not be capable of adhering to the necessary standards of conduct expected of a registered customs broker. Revocation serves as a necessary measure to uphold the integrity of customs operations and protect the regulatory system from those who repeatedly fail to comply with the law.

Each violation builds upon the last, and as such, the authority may view a third offense not merely as a standalone incident but as a clear indication of a lack of regard for important legal guidelines. The severity of the offense, in combination with the frequency of infractions, justifies the revocation of registration as a means of ensuring compliance and safeguarding customs practices.